Journal article

Civil Law and Criminal Law: Evolution, Instrumentalization, Negative Side Effects

Pages 49 to 59

Cite this article


  • Rebut, D.
(2009). Civil Law and Criminal Law: Evolution, Instrumentalization, Negative Side Effects. Pouvoirs, No 128(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.3917/pouv.128.0049.

  • Rebut, Didier.
« Civil Law and Criminal Law: Evolution, Instrumentalization, Negative Side Effects ». Pouvoirs, 2009/1 No 128, 2009. p.49-59. CAIRN.INFO, droit.cairn.info/journal-pouvoirs-2009-1-page-49?lang=en.

  • REBUT, Didier,
2009. Civil Law and Criminal Law: Evolution, Instrumentalization, Negative Side Effects. Pouvoirs, 2009/1 No 128, p.49-59. DOI : 10.3917/pouv.128.0049. URL : https://droit.cairn.info/journal-pouvoirs-2009-1-page-49?lang=en.

https://doi.org/10.3917/pouv.128.0049


English

The recourse to criminal law instead of civil law is often presented as one of the manifestations of the process of criminalization. It is true that criminal law offers more advantages than civil law, which explains why litigants prefer the former. Lawmakers have acknowledged this situation and have tried to limit access to criminal justice and to reduce its advantages. Yet, these restrictions can only be limited, given the fact that access to criminal justice, which is a fundamental right, cannot be prohibited. It follows that access to criminal justice will diminish in favour of civil justice only if the latter is reformed so as to present similar advantages.

Keywords

This article is available in conditional access

Cairn Pro Management - Journals

From €25 per month

300 full-text journals at the heart of your profession
Already subscribed to Cairn Pro? Member of a client institution?