<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Le « trumpisme » | Cairn.info</title>
    <icon>https://shs.cairn.info/build/assets/cairn-B7RWiji2.png</icon>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:rss/liste-lecture/460100</id>
    <rights>Cairn.info 2026</rights>

    <link href="https://droit.cairn.info/rss/liste-lecture/460100" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" />
    <link href="https://droit.cairn.info?lang=en" type="text/html" />

    <updated></updated>

                            <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:VIN_153_0003</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Aux racines du «&#160;trumpisme&#160;»&#160;: un illibéralisme
américain |
        L’Amérique illibérale de Trump
                    | 20 &amp; 21. Revue d&#039;histoire
            (2022/1 N° 153)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-vingt-et-vingt-et-un-revue-d-histoire-2022-1-page-3?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2022-06-23T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-06T12:43:48+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Despite its obvious importance in recent American political history
and its surprising resiliency as a political movement, “Trumpism”
remains particularly challenging to define as a political
phenomenon. From among the many labels that are used to describe
this movement, the authors of the introductory chapter choose the
term “illiberalism,” as the latter not only highlights the
continuity between Trumpism and the least liberal elements of
American history, but also captures the uniqueness of Trump’s
tenure as president of the U.S., including his staunch opposition
to the most politically, economically, and culturally liberal
aspects of American history. Trumpism may thus be viewed as the
American version of a new paradigm that is defining our times.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:PE_182_0091</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        <i>America First</i> au pouvoir |
        Cybersécurité&#160;: extension du domaine de la lutte
                    | Politique étrangère
            (2018/2 Été)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-politique-etrangere-2018-2-page-91?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2018-05-18T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-06T11:46:07+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Supported by Mike Pompeo and John Bolton, President Trump is
seeking to take direct control over foreign policy decisions,
despite the difficulty of fitting the Trump doctrine into the
narrative of American diplomatic relations. With the appointment of
Pompeo and Bolton, the administration has put its cards on the
table, with a strategy of permanent tension vis-à-vis Iran, Syria,
and North Korea. Calls to observe norms and values remain unheeded
in the face of a strategy focusing on interests.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:RIPC_281_0085</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        La politique chrétienne&#160;aux États-Unis de Donald&#160;Trump à
Joe Biden. De l’ultra-polarisation au reflux du <i>God
gap&#160;?</i> |
        Partis politiques et religions : entre sacralisation du politique
et sécularisation du religieux
                    | Revue int. de politique comparée
            (2021/1-2 Vol. 28)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-politique-comparee-2021-1-page-85?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2021-12-23T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-06T10:13:38+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Donald Trump’s success with Christian voters in the 2016 election
took many commentators by surprise. Trump’s personality and his
irreligiosity appeared to put him at odds with this constituency,
leading many to predict that he would fail to win them over. Yet,
observant white evangelicals and Catholics voted overwhelmingly for
the New York-based outsider. Their resentment vis-à-vis the
advances of the LGBT cause, as well as a sense that the Obama
administration in its second term had conducted a policy hostile to
Christians, gave Trump the opportunity to lead a revanchist
campaign centered around the promise of restoring America to its
Christian roots. In doing so, Donald Trump laid the ground for a
“Christianist” policy that only grew stronger during his
presidency. However, the constituency of observant white Christians
started to break up and some of them chose Joe Biden in the 2020
election. Comparing the results of the 2016 and 2020 elections
reveals a decline in polarization, which might signal a narrowing
of the God gap.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:numero:POLAM_037</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        La présidence Trump
                    | Politique américaine
            (2021/2 N° 37)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[De la politique étrangère à la politique de l'étranger]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-politique-americaine-2021-2?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
            <published>2021-12-27T00:00:00+01:00</published>
                <updated>2024-02-06T10:13:22+01:00</updated>
                <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Le 20 janvier 2021 a marqué la fin officielle de la présidence
Trump - une présidence controversée qui se voulait être celle de la
rupture, notamment en matière de politique étrangère. Sur ce point,
comment peut-on appréhender les diverses actions menées par Donald
Trump à l'international au cours de ses années au pouvoir ?
Surtout, dans quelle mesure sa politique étrangère
représente-t-elle un tournant pour les États-Unis ? Ce dossier se
propose ainsi d'analyser la politique extérieure conduite par Trump
non seulement en tant que telle, mais aussi à travers un prisme
plus large permettant de la mettre en perspective par rapport aux
présidences précédentes. Il s'agit donc bien, en d'autres termes,
de porter un regard sur ce « moment Donald Trump » : quatre années
qui, indéniablement, continuent de peser dans le débat politique
américain.</p>
]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <ul>
                            <li>
                     Pages 5 to 7| Éditorial
                                            |  Pierre Bourgois
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 9 to 15| Donald Trump et la politique internationale&#160;: regards croisés
sur une présidence controversée
                                            |  Pierre Bourgois,  Bradley Smith
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 17 to 38| Donald Trump&#160;: déconstructeur-en-chef de «&#160;l’ordre
libéral international&#160;»&#160;?
                                            |  Adrien Schu
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 39 to 60| Zero Tolerance:&#160;The Trump Administration’s Permanent
Anti-Immigrant Offensive and its Repercussions in the Americas
                                            |  James Cohen
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 61 to 86| La «&#160;doctrine Trump&#160;» à l’international&#160;: l’Amérique
contre le reste du monde&#160;?
                                            |  Alexis Pichard
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 87 to 109| Une cité au milieu de la plaine&#160;? L’exceptionnalisme américain
à l’épreuve de Trump
                                            |  Frédéric Heurtebize
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 111 to 132| Le «&#160;choc de Trump&#160;» et la Chine&#160;: leçons du
protectionnisme trumpien
                                            |  Jean-Baptiste Velut
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 133 to 147| Point de vue. L’administration Trump et les enjeux stratégiques
américains en Méditerranée orientale&#160;: l’impossible poursuite
du désengagement&#160;?
                                            |  Maud Quessard
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 151 to 170| La <i>realpolitik</i> européenne au service de la destinée
américaine&#160;? Les clairs-obscurs de la pensée d’Henry Kissinger
                                            |  Jean-Loup Samaan
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 171a to 176a| <b>Américanisation. Une histoire mondiale (<span class=
"marquage petitecap">xviii</span><sup>e</sup>-<span class=
"marquage petitecap">xxi</span><sup>e</sup>&#160;siècles),</b>
<span class="marquage petitecap">Ludovic Tournès,</span> Paris,
Fayard, 2020, 447&#160;p.
                                            |  Élisa Chelle
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 171b to 178b| <b>Texas v. California. A History of their Struggle for the Future
of America,</b> <span class="marquage petitecap">Kenneth P.
Miller,</span> New York, Oxford University Press, 2020, 372&#160;p.
                                            |  François Vergniolle de Chantal
                                    </li>
                    </ul>
    ]]></content>
</entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:SAY_001_0200</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Déconstruire Donald |
        Vaincre la crise
                    | SAY
            (2020/1-2 N° 1-2)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-say-2020-1-page-200?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2020-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-06T10:12:29+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:POLAM_037_0087</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Une cité au milieu de la plaine&#160;? L’exceptionnalisme américain
à l’épreuve de Trump |
        La présidence Trump
                    | Politique américaine
            (2021/2 N° 37)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-politique-americaine-2021-2-page-87?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2021-12-27T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-06T10:05:58+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Despite his campaign promises, and for all his rhetorically
disruptive and unpredictable conduct of foreign policy, Donald
Trump did not break away from his predecessors as radically as is
generally assumed. His policy of retrenchment in the Middle East,
for instance, followed Obama’s just as his brutal unilateralist
outlook was a sequel to George W. Bush’s first term. Donald Trump’s
most transgressive move, then, may have been his rejection of
American exceptionalism. Never since the early 1940s has a
president refused to contemplate the US as the leader of
democracies and to promote – if only through discourse – human
rights. The concept of exceptionalism rested on the belief that the
United States was uniquely blessed and ought to be a provider of
peace, stability and other services for the global commonweal as
well as for its own interests. Trump’s “America First” policy, it
seems, tolled the knell of that concept and it is too early to know
how easy or hard it will prove for his predecessors to revive.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:DEC_BADIE_2019_01_0076</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Donald Trump, ou la diplomatie du rapport de forces |
        Fin du leadership américain&#160;?
                    (2019)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/fin-du-leadership-americain--9782348045653-page-76?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2019-08-30T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-06T10:00:57+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:VIN_153_0033</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Les ressources chrétiennes de l’illibéralisme états-unien |
        L’Amérique illibérale de Trump
                    | 20 &amp; 21. Revue d&#039;histoire
            (2022/1 N° 153)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-vingt-et-vingt-et-un-revue-d-histoire-2022-1-page-33?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2022-06-23T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:29:16+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Since the 1970s, the political use of Christianity has veered
sharply to the right, giving rise to a fully-fledged Christian
Right movement, which has progressively consolidated its dominant
position among Republican conservatives. References to Christianity
have also been used to give new life to the Far Right, fostering
along the way a growing amalgam of anti-liberal and illiberal
proposals that bled into the populist backdrop of the 2016 and 2020
presidential campaigns led by Donald Trump. American scholars have
variously defined the resulting movement as Christian Populism,
Christian Nationalism, or Christianism. This article looks at the
various trends within this movement.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:VIN_153_0019</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Trump ou l’apocalypse |
        L’Amérique illibérale de Trump
                    | 20 &amp; 21. Revue d&#039;histoire
            (2022/1 N° 153)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-vingt-et-vingt-et-un-revue-d-histoire-2022-1-page-19?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2022-06-23T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:29:07+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Donald Trump’s explosion onto the American political landscape
divided the conservative intellectual movement in two. While some
conservatives became “Never Trumpers,” others enthusiastically
supported the outsider president. This was particularly true of the
contemporary disciples of Leo Strauss and Harry V. Jaffa, who write
for the influential conservative journal the Claremont Review of
Books. These so-called “West Coast Straussians” vociferously
defended Trump’s decisions in terms of immigration policy and
judicial appointments in the name of a philosophy that calls for a
return to the doctrine of natural law, which they view as
inseparable from the meaning of American democracy itself.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:HER_184_0201</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Les réseaux sociaux et l’administration Trump |
        L'Amérique post-Trump&#160;?
                    | Hérodote
            (2022/1-2 N° 184-185)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-herodote-2022-1-page-201?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2022-03-03T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:27:53+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Social media have come under fire because of the activities of
their most controversial user, Donald Trump. The criticisms
addressed to Facebook, Twitter or YouTube include the failure to
moderate the contentious publications of the former president and
his entourage. These contents were likely to constitute incitement
to violence or hatred, to fall within the scope of disinformation,
to reinforce the polarization of public opinion or to undermine
democratic processes. This article assesses the contributions of
social media to the issues that have arisen under the Trump
administration and the steps taken to address them. It draws on the
relationships and power dynamics between President Trump and the
platforms&#160;; the actions of social media to prevent harm&#160;;
the alleged bias of the social media&#160;; and the storming of
Capitol Hill and subsequent suspension of the president’s accounts.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:HER_184_0153</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        De quoi le 6 janvier est-il le signe&#160;? Essai d’histoire
immédiate |
        L'Amérique post-Trump&#160;?
                    | Hérodote
            (2022/1-2 N° 184-185)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-herodote-2022-1-page-153?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2022-03-03T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:27:39+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[On January 6, 2021, Congress was invaded by hundreds of Trump
supporters in what is generally considered the worst contestation
of democratic institutions in the U.S. since the Civil War. It is
yet difficult to determine everything that happened about such
fundamental but very recent event. Key investigations are still
taking place led by the Justice Department and by a bipartisan
congressional commission. The very definition of that event remains
a bone of contention between parties. This article attempts to give
several factors pertinent to what happened. It looks at the
tradition of violence among far right and militia type groups. It
explores the double crisis of the early 21st&#160;century in
America&#160;: the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the
Great Recession of 2008. Finally, the role of President Trump
himself is surveyed.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:HER_149_0129</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Une majorité républicaine permanente&#160;? |
        L’Amérique d’Obama, 2
                    | Hérodote
            (2013/2 n° 149)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-herodote-2013-2-page-129?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2013-06-01T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:25:17+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[A permanent republican majority? Consequences of the 2011
gerrymandering The&#160;2010&#160;elections had a tremendous impact
on US politics and one of the most important was putting the
Republican Party in charge of redistricting a majority of the House
of Representatives districts. The GOP had the historic opportunity
to influence the partisan makeup of the House for several electoral
cycles. However, a majority of numbers does not guarantee a
stronger political position. Paradoxically, this attempt at
creating a permanent republican majority could slow down the
emergence of a new conservative coalition that the demographic
evolution of the country has rendered urgent. The impact of
gerrymandering is therefore remarkable since it influences the very
nature of the power struggle between two parties and, in the end,
the rhythm of their ideological evolution.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:POLAM_029_0023</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Au paroxysme de la polarisation&#160;: les paradoxes de la
stratégie électorale du Parti républicain |
        Le parti républicain à la croisée des chemins
                    | Politique américaine
            (2017/1 N° 29)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-politique-americaine-2017-1-page-23?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2017-05-01T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:25:02+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[When the Reagan coalition disintegrated in 2008 and republicans
were faced with a steadily increasing non-white electorate, the
party opted for a short-term electoral strategy. This strategy
championed laws designed to demobilize the Democratic electorate.
This tactic is that of a party that is pushing an outdated
electoral strategy to its limits and it is therefore another
manifestation of the party’s crisis.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:POLAM_032_0041</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        La crise identitaire du Parti démocrate face à l’avènement de
l’aristocratie blanche |
        Egalité et mobilité sociale aux Etats-Unis : "la recherche du
bonheur" est-elle confisquée ?
                    | Politique américaine
            (2018/1 N° 32)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-politique-americaine-2019-1-page-41?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2018-12-20T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:24:53+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The American financial capitalism and wealth inheritance mechanisms
are creating a new form of aristocracy that is almost exclusively
white. This racial stratification, and its statistical measure,
changes the perspective many Americans have of inequality. First,
this paper proposes to examine the extent of the conjoined nature
of race and class in today’s United-States. Then, it analyses the
strategic dilemma of the Democratic Party in response to the advent
of this white aristocracy. The party is strongly divided over the
lessons to be drawn from 2016. Yet, it is pushed, almost
reluctantly, toward some form of intersectionality by powerful
electoral constraints.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:OUTE1_038_0106</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Ascension et déclin du mouvement Tea Party (2009-2013)&#160;: Un
défaut de leadership&#160;? |
        Barack Obama et le nouveau monde (II)
                    | Outre-Terre
            (2014/1 N° 38)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-outre-terre2-2014-1-page-106?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2014-01-13T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:23:09+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:OUTE1_050_0126</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        (Dés) illusions du patriotisme économique Du «&#160;carnage
américain&#160;» à «&#160;l’Amérique d’abord&#160;» |
        Les leçons de Donald Trump
                    | Outre-Terre
            (2017/1 N° 50)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-outre-terre2-2017-1-page-126?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2017-06-30T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:22:01+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:OUTE1_050_0093</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Sur fond de crispation identitaire, la détresse du Midwest
industriel |
        Les leçons de Donald Trump
                    | Outre-Terre
            (2017/1 N° 50)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-outre-terre2-2017-1-page-93?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2017-06-30T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:21:50+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:POUV_172_0111</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Donald Trump aux prises avec le Congrès&#160;: un leadership en
trompe-l’œil |
        Trump
                    | Pouvoirs
            (2020/1 N° 172)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://droit.cairn.info/revue-pouvoirs-2020-1-page-111?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2020-01-06T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:20:57+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Should the Trump presidency be seen as a renewal of the “imperial
presidency”, originally denounced by Arthur Schlesinger? Donald
Trump’s postures could induce some to identify them as a form of
authoritarianism, but this presidency is, on the contrary, the
symptom of a polarised political system torn apart by partisan
divisions, in which the executive’s actions are often thwarted.
While Barack Obama’s presidency also illustrated the limits of
presidential powers in a polarised partisan context, Donald Trump’s
illustrates what happens when the presidency itself is polarised.
It has become a mere shadow of the New Deal presidency. Henceforth,
the host of the White House’s plebiscitary powers seem limited to
the mobilisation of a narrow electoral base through the social
networks and the multiplication of administrative fiats.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:PE_202_0045</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Qu’est-ce que le «&#160;trumpisme&#160;»&#160;? |
        COVID-19&#160;: choc sanitaire et géopolitique
                    | Politique étrangère
            (2020/2 Été)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-politique-etrangere-2020-2-page-45?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2020-05-25T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:20:49+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Trumpism takes the form of a presidency that is more demagogic than
authoritarian, whose main dynamic is an exacerbated and
personalized polarization. Such a development undermines the
president’s capacity to govern. Thus, Trump’s legacy risks being
reduced to the conditions that allowed him to come to power in 2016
and that remain palpable: the personalization of power, media
omnipresence, the deregulation of campaign financing, and electoral
apathy.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:DEBA_202_0036</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Une politique étrangère populiste&#160;? |
        Varia
                    | Le Débat
            (2018/5 n° 202)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-le-debat-2018-5-page-36?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2018-11-12T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2024-02-04T16:18:19+01:00</updated>
    </entry>
            </feed>
